Krutsik et al v. Frontier Airlines
Iryna Krutsik, Nelya Kryshchuk, Oleksandr Kryshchuk, Mikhail Krasnopolskiy, Mark Kolodizner, Alisa Kolodizner, Marina Krasnopolskiy, Helen Kolodizner and Josjua Kolodizner |
Frontier Airlines and Indigo Partners, LLC |
1:2015cv03430 |
April 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
John J. Tharp |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 8/31/2018: For the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, defendant Frontier Airlines, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment 111 is granted. Ju dgment will be entered in favor of defendant Frontier Airlines, Inc. The plaintiffs are ordered to comply with Judge Kim's August 1, 2017 Order 92 and to file on the Court's docket by September 10, 2018, proof of payment of $1,040 to Frontier. Enter Judgment Order. The claims of any putative class members are dismissed without prejudice. Civil Case Terminated. Mailed notice(air, ) |
Filing 51 ORDER: For the reasons stated below, Defendant's motion to dismiss and sever 24 is granted. All claims for non-economic damages are dismissed with prejudice. Claims brought by the Adler Plaintiffs (who were joined after the Tarkov Plaintiffs) are severed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21; if they wish to pursue their claims further, the Adler Plaintiffs are required to refile their claims in a new complaint and as a separate case; they will also be required to pay a separate filing fee. Furt her, the Adler Plaintiffs are directed when filing the new case to indicate on the Civil Cover Sheet (Section X) that their case is a refiling of case number 15-cv-3430 previously dismissed by Judge Tharp; the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this new case directly to Judge Tharp's docket. The Tarkov Plaintiffs will be required to file a fifth amended complaint that omits allegations relevant only to the Adler claims. Neither revised complaint should be prepared or filed, however, u ntil after a status hearing to be held on May 23, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant's motion for leave to supplement its motion to dismiss instanter 47 is denied without prejudice as moot in light of this ruling. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 5/19/2017. Mailed notice(air, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.