United States of America v. Edmond
||United States of America
||April 22, 2015
||US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
||XX US, Outside the State of IL
||Matthew F. Kennelly
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2255
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 14, 2017
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/14/2017. Mailed notice (meg, )
|August 7, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/7/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court concludes that defense trial counsel's decision not to file a motion to sup press was objectively unreasonable. The issue of prejudice remains for determination. The Court sets the case for a status hearing on August 11, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are to be prepared to discuss at that time what evidence will be offered on the issue of prejudice and whether an evidentiary hearing will be necessary, and if so to set a prompt date for the hearing. (mk)
|November 9, 2015
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/9/2015. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies defendant's request to modify his sentence but declines to dismiss his section 2255 motion. The Court will appoint counsel to represent Edmond on the motion. A status hearing is set for December 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?