Suppressed v. suppressed

Suppressed v. suppressed

Plaintiff:	Suppressed
Defendant:	Suppressed
Case Number:	1:2015cv04453
Filed:	May 20, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Robert W. Gettleman
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2016	Filing 143 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 6/28/2016. Mailed notice (tt, )
November 16, 2015	Filing 106 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and Supervision of Discovery 70 is denied. See attached Statement for further details. The parties shall confer about entry of a confidentiality order in this case using the Northern District' ;s Model Confidentiality Order as a base or guide in an effort to resolve any disagreements without court action. If the parties are unable to reach consensus, they should submit their respective proposed orders to the Court, in accordance with the p rocedure described on Magistrate Judge Gilbert's website, each with a brief cover memorandum explaining why their respective proposed order should be entered rather than their opponent's order. All parties shall make their Rule 26(a)(1) di sclosures by December 7, 2015. Defendant Community Health Systems, Inc.'s Rule 26 disclosures are without prejudice to its pending Rule 26(b)(2) motion. The parties also shall meet and confer in-person and then submit a joint discovery plan pu rsuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before December 14, 2015. That plan should address, among the other topics mentioned in Rule 26(f), proposed dates for the service of written discovery, the identities of the people each party believes it will depose and, if possible, dates for those depositions, an expert discovery schedule if any party will be disclosing Rule 26(a)(2) experts, and dates for the close of fact and expert discovery. The parties' submission should note any disagreements with any aspect of the plan and the parties' respective positions in that regard. This matter is set for a further status hearing on December 17, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., for discussion of a discovery plan. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/16/2015. Mailed notice (ber, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2016

Filing 143 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 6/28/2016. Mailed notice (tt, )

November 16, 2015

Filing 106 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and Supervision of Discovery 70 is denied. See attached Statement for further details. The parties shall confer about entry of a confidentiality order in this case using the Northern District' ;s Model Confidentiality Order as a base or guide in an effort to resolve any disagreements without court action. If the parties are unable to reach consensus, they should submit their respective proposed orders to the Court, in accordance with the p rocedure described on Magistrate Judge Gilbert's website, each with a brief cover memorandum explaining why their respective proposed order should be entered rather than their opponent's order. All parties shall make their Rule 26(a)(1) di sclosures by December 7, 2015. Defendant Community Health Systems, Inc.'s Rule 26 disclosures are without prejudice to its pending Rule 26(b)(2) motion. The parties also shall meet and confer in-person and then submit a joint discovery plan pu rsuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before December 14, 2015. That plan should address, among the other topics mentioned in Rule 26(f), proposed dates for the service of written discovery, the identities of the people each party believes it will depose and, if possible, dates for those depositions, an expert discovery schedule if any party will be disclosing Rule 26(a)(2) experts, and dates for the close of fact and expert discovery. The parties' submission should note any disagreements with any aspect of the plan and the parties' respective positions in that regard. This matter is set for a further status hearing on December 17, 2015, at 1:30 p.m., for discussion of a discovery plan. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/16/2015. Mailed notice (ber, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suppressed v. suppressed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Suppressed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suppressed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?