Karney v. Naperville Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Patrick Karney
Defendant: Naperville Police Department and John Doe
Case Number: 1:2015cv04608
Filed: May 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, (1) the City's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike, 29 , is denied; (2) Officer Fletcher's Motion to dismiss, 33 , is denied; and (3) Officer Boogerd's Motion to Dismiss, [ 32],is granted as to Count Four of the Second Amended Complaint and denied in all other respects. Defendants are directed to file a joint status report on or before October 28, 2016. Status hearing set for 11/1/2016 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/18/2016:Mailed notice(srn, )
October 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court dismisses Karney's claims against the Naperville Police Department, and orders that the City of Naperville be joined in its place as the real party in interest. City Of Naperville added. Naperville P olice Department terminated. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Naperville's motion to dismiss 13 is granted as to Karney's claims against the City of Naperville only and denied as to the IIED claim against the individual officer def endants. Karney's Section 1983 claims against the City of Naperville, as alleged in Counts One, Two, Three and Six [sic Five] of the amended complaint (R. 10-1) are dismissed without prejudice. In addition, Karney's motion to amend his comp laint 20 is denied without prejudice. Karney shall have thirty days to file a new amended complaint. If, after thirty days, Karney has not filed an amended complaint, then Karney's Section 1983 claims against the City of Naperville will be dismissed with prejudice. Any amended complaint Karney files going forward shall name the City of Naperville as the proper Monell defendant. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/22/2015:Mailed notice(srn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Karney v. Naperville Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Karney
Represented By: Andre P Gaston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Naperville Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?