Guerrero v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
| Julio C. Guerrero |
| Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Obaisi, Latanya Williams, Shanel Barnett, J Doe, Paul Saporito, Anna McBee, Sherry Benton, O'Brien, Michael Lemke, R. Brown-Reed, S.A. Godinez and Gomez |
| 1:2015cv05064 |
| June 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| John J. Tharp |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 2/13/2020. Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 7/25/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the IDOC Defendants' motion to dismiss 65 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to Barnett, who is dismissed from this case with prejudice. The motion is also granted as to defendants Gomez and O'Brien as to Count II only; they remain defendants as to Count III. Randy Pfister and John Baldwin are substituted for Lemke and Godinez, respectively, as to Count II as they currently serve as the warden of Stateville and the Director of the IDOC. The motion is otherwise denied. A status hearing is set on 8/3/17 at 9 a.m. Mailed notice(air, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
