Santos v. Williams
| Carlos Santos |
| Tarry Williams |
| 1:2015cv05325 |
| June 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Marvin E. Aspen |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
209
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: Presently before us is Petitioner Carlos Santos's request for a certificate of appealability 198 and motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis 205 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For the reasons stated herein, we deny Santos's motions. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 4/21/2021. Mailed notice (ags)
|
|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: Presently before us are Santos' objections to Magistrate Judge Finnegan's Report and Recommendation. (Objections (Dkt. No. 186 ).) Magistrate Judge Finnegan recommends that Santos' request for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Dkt. No. 184 ).) For the reasons set forth below, we overrule Santos' objections, adopt the R&R, and deny Santos' habeas petition. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 1/5/2021. Mailed notice (ags)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 5/18/2017: Respondent's motion to reconsider 42 the December 2, 2016 Order is granted in part and denied in part. This matter remains referred to Magistrate Judge Sheila M. Finnegan to conduct a hearing and file a Report and Recommendation as to Claim One. A status hearing will be set before this Court on August 24, 2017.Mailed notice(mad, )
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 12/2/2016: The Court determines that petitioner Santos is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on Claim One of his petition in order to determine whether he was prejudiced by the s tate court's ex parte communication with the jury and the jury's consideration of a dictionary during their deliberations. Under Rule 8(c) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, counsel will be appointed to aid Santos in the evidentiary hearing to be conducted before Magistrate Judge Sheila Finnegan. The Magistrate Judge, after conducting the hearing, shall file a Report and Recommendation as to Claim One. Santos' petition is denied with respect to the Brady claim raised in Claim Two. A status hearing is set before this Court on March 2, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.Mailed notice(mad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Santos v. Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Carlos Santos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Tarry Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
