Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Petitioner: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent: Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv06304
Filed: July 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Mary M. Rowland
Presiding Judge: John J. Tharp
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Brandi Lorraine Davis
Represented By: John C. Hendrickson
Represented By: Diane Ilene Smason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Represented By: Kwabena Agyepong Appenteng
Represented By: Keith C. Hult
Represented By: Adam Carl Wit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?