Hicks v. City Of Chicago et al
| Patricia Hicks |
| City Of Chicago, Cook County Sheriff's Office, Officer Murphy, Unknown Chicago Police Officers and Unknown Cook County Sheriff's Deputies |
| 1:2015cv06852 |
| August 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
289
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 3/19/2020: For the reasons discussed in the opinion, the defense motions for summary judgment 252 257 260 are granted in part and denied in part. The following claims survi ve: (1) Smith's illegal-seizure claim against Murphy and Mousel for the initial traffic stop; (2) Smith's illegal-seizure claim against Murphy and Mears for the seizure in Mears' police vehicle; (3) Hicks' illegal-seizure claim ag ainst Murphy and Mears for her seizure in Mears' police vehicle; (4) all of McBride's claims against Murphy (who did not move for summary judgment against her); and (5) the Plaintiffs' indemnification claim against the Village of Lynwo od and the Cook County Sheriff's Office. The Defendants are otherwise entitled to summary judgment on the rest of the Plaintiffs' claims. Status hearing of 03/26/2020 is reset for 4/16/2020 at 10:15 a.m. The parties shall confer on next steps, including whether a settlement referral would helpful. Emailed notice(Chang, Edmond)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Defendant Mears's motion 122 to dismiss Smith's claims against Mears is denied.Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the motions [75, 77, 81] to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part. The following claims survive: Fourth Amendment unreasonable seiz ure (Count Two); Fourth Amendment unreasonable search (Count Three); failure to intervene on the Fourth Amendment claims (Count Four); indemnification (Count Eight); and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count Nine). The remaining claims are dismissed. On or before 10/06/2017, the parties shall file a status report proposing a discovery schedule. At the very least, Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due by 10/24/2017. The first round of written discovery requests may be issued immediatel y, and that first round must be issued no later than 10/31/2017. Also, Plaintiff Hicks and the plaintiffs in the related case, 17 C 4951, shall confer with the defense about filing a consolidated amended complaint on this case's docket. The status hearing of 10/10/2017 remains in place. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
