Mustafa v. NSI International, Inc. et al
| Mona Mustafa |
| NSI International, Inc., Frank Landi, Farra Chan, Sanford Frank, Powerview Investments, NSI Products (HK) Limited, Mammoth Toys, Milman Labuda Law Group, PLLC, Joe Labuda and Jamie S Felsen |
| 1:2015cv06997 |
| August 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| John J. Tharp |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons discussed in the attached memorandum opinion, Defendants' motion to dismiss 18 is granted with prejudice. Defendant's motion for sanctions 39 is granted. Plaintiff's motions for default 68 , 70 , 72 , 74 , 76 , 78 , 80 , 82 , 84 , 86 are denied. Defendants NSI and MLLG are directed to submit their calculation of reasonable fees and costs, with affidavits and other supporting documentation as needed, within 21 days of the entry of this order. The plaintiff must file any objections within 21 days thereafter, or any objections will be waived; Mustafa may include with her response information relevant to the question of her ability to pay an additional award of sanctions (beyond the award already imposed in the Eastern District of New York). Enter judgment. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 11/16/2016. Mailed notice(air, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
