Branscomb v. Smolek et al
John Branscomb |
Officer Smolek, Officer Bedoy and City of Chicago |
1:2015cv07196 |
August 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Thomas M Durkin |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Civil case terminated. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear its own fees and costs. The 7/8/2016 status date is vacated. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 23 NOTICE by Bedoy, City of Chicago, Smolek re stipulation of dismissal #22 (Kowalczyk, Lawrence) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Kowalczyk, Lawrence) |
Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Status hearing held on 6/8/2016. Status hearing set for 7/8/2016 at 09:00 AM. If a stipulation to dismiss is filed before the next status hearing, no appearance will be required.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Status hearing held on 4/18/2016. Close of fact discovery is extended to 6/8/2016. Status hearing set for 6/8/2016 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 19 CONFIDENTIALITY Order: Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/11/2016:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Status hearing held on 2/3/2016. Status hearing set for 4/18/2016 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 17 PROTECTIVE Order: Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/1/2015:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 16 NOTICE by Bedoy, City of Chicago, Smolek re complaint #1 (Kowalczyk, Lawrence) |
Filing 15 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Bedoy, City of Chicago, Smolek(Kowalczyk, Lawrence) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bedoy, Smolek by Megan Kathleen Monaghan (Monaghan, Megan) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bedoy, Smolek by Lawrence S. Kowalczyk (Kowalczyk, Lawrence) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Status hearing held on 10/26/2015. Rule 26 disclosures to be exchanged by 11/30/15. Written discovery to be issued by 12/30/15. Fact Discovery ordered closed by 5/2/2016. Defendant has to 11/9/15 to answer or otherwise plead. Status hearing set for 2/3/2016 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by John Branscomb re status report #10 (Maisuria, Ronak) |
Filing 10 STATUS Report JOINT by John Branscomb (Maisuria, Ronak) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Megan Kathleen Monaghan (Monaghan, Megan) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Lawrence S. Kowalczyk (Kowalczyk, Lawrence) |
![]() |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (dc, ) |
Filing 6 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Maisuria, Ronak) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Branscomb by Jon Robert Neuleib (Neuleib, Jon) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Branscomb by Michael D. Oppenheimer (Oppenheimer, Michael) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Branscomb by Jon F Erickson (Erickson, Jon) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Branscomb by Ronak P. Maisuria (Maisuria, Ronak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by John Branscomb; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-10978405.(Maisuria, Ronak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.