Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO et al v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
Plaintiff: Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Edward V Scott and Donald L. Garrett, Jr.
Defendant: Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Case Number: 1:2015cv08149
Filed: September 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Sara L. Ellis
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and order, the Court denies Plaintiffs' and the Board's motions for summary judgment 302 , 304 . Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 3/17/2021. Mailed notice(rj, )
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 79 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies the Board's motion to exclude Trujillo's testimony 254 . The Court also denies Plaintiffs' motion to exclude Jacob's testimony 258 . The Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs 9; motion to exclude Blanchflower's testimony 258 . The Court excludes Blanchflower's legal conclusions about race discrimination, his opinions regarding employee turnover, and his opinions regarding the hearing officer reports. The Court grants in part and denies in part the Board's motion to exclude Walker's opinions 256 . The Court excludes Walker's opinions regarding the hypothetical in Report 1, Figure 10. The Court also excludes Blanchflower's declaration, which the Board filed in support of the its motion to exclude Walker's opinions, Doc. 257-1, Exhibit 7. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/25/2020:Mailed notice(rj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO et al v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Robin B. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward V Scott
Represented By: Robin B. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald L. Garrett, Jr.
Represented By: Robin B. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Represented By: Cheryl J. Colston
Represented By: Lisa A. Dreishmire
Represented By: Susan Margaret O'Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?