Sherako v. US Foods, Inc. et al
David Sherako |
US Foods, Inc., US Foods Corona, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 |
1:2015cv08485 |
September 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Jorge L. Alonso |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Before the Court are two motions: 1) the parties' joint motion for clarification of scheduling order 50 , which is granted; and 2) defendant US Foods, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment 49 , which is denied without prejudice to refiling at an appropriate time. The December 6, 2016 motion hearing is stricken. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/1/2016. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. US Foods, Inc.'s motion to dismiss the complaint 9 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied as to plaintiff's claims that are based on the March Letter, but to the extent that plaintiff 9;s claims are based on any alleged defamatory statements other than theMarch Letter, they are dismissed without prejudice. The discovery stay is lifted, and a status hearing is set for April 26, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. for the purpose of setting a discovery cutoff. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 4/12/2016. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 4/12/2016. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.