Dragus v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Dragus v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Dragus v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	John Dragus
Defendant:	Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2015cv09135
Filed:	October 15, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge:	Marvin E. Aspen
Nature of Suit:	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2017	Filing 58 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 3/29/2017: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 33 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to supplement the record 52 is denied. Defendant's motion for summary judgment 38 is granted. Status hearing of 4/20/2017 is stricken. Judgment entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Civil case terminated.Mailed notice(mad, )
July 21, 2016	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 7/21/2016: Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's request for additional discovery made in open court on February 18, 2016, is granted in part and denied in part, as stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order. Defendant must provide the claim file and administrative record to Plaintiff for discovery on or by July 31, 2016. Plaintiff is not entitled to Rule 26(a) initial disclosures or additional discovery at this time.Mailed notice(mad, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2017

Filing 58 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 3/29/2017: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 33 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to supplement the record 52 is denied. Defendant's motion for summary judgment 38 is granted. Status hearing of 4/20/2017 is stricken. Judgment entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Civil case terminated.Mailed notice(mad, )

July 21, 2016

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 7/21/2016: Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's request for additional discovery made in open court on February 18, 2016, is granted in part and denied in part, as stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order. Defendant must provide the claim file and administrative record to Plaintiff for discovery on or by July 31, 2016. Plaintiff is not entitled to Rule 26(a) initial disclosures or additional discovery at this time.Mailed notice(mad, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dragus v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Dragus
Represented By:	Mark D. DeBofsky
Represented By:	William Thomas Reynolds, IV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Represented By:	Edna Sybil Kersting
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?