Sailsbery v. Village of Sauk Village et al
| Rebecca Sailsbery |
| Village of Sauk Village, David Hanks, J.W. Fairman and Fairman Consultants, Ltd. |
| 1:2015cv10564 |
| November 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Sara L. Ellis |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
238
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Motion to Compel or Bar Pursuant to Rule 37 229 is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: 1) Plaintiff must produce documents relevant to Defendant's Third Request for Production Numbers 1 and 5 with ten days of entry of this order; 2) the motion is denied as to Defendant's Third Request for Production Number 4; 3) the motion is denied to the extent it seeks to bar the video discussed herein pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1). - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 9/17/2020. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing
178
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court grants Hanks and Fairman's motion for summary judgment 160 and grants in part and denies in part the Village's motion for summary judgment 164 . The Court denies FC's motion for judgment on the pleading s 155 as moot. The Court enters judgment in favor of Hanks, Fairman, and FC. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 3/4/2019. David Hanks (Mayor, individually), J.W. Fairman (individually and in his official capacity as Public Safety Director) and Fairman Consultants, Ltd. (an Illinois Corporation) terminated. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 3/4/2019. Mailed notice(rj, )
|
|
Filing
134
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and Order, the Court denies the motion to disqualify 118 . The Court orders Gabriel Judd and Lewis Brisbois to furnish compliance statements to Sailsbery in accordance with Model Rule of Professional Responsibility 1.10(a)(2)(ii)(iii) by December 8, 2017. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 11/28/2017:Mailed notice(rj, )
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies the Village of Sauk Village's motion to dismiss 27 , denies in part and grants in part Mayor David Hanks' motion to dismiss 28 , and denies in part and grants in part J.W. Fairman's motion to dism iss 24 . The Court dismisses Sailsbery's equal protection claims in Count V and VI against Mayor Hanks and Fairman to the extent they allege she was not promoted to Chief of Police, but the Court denies Defendants' motions to dismiss Sai lsbery's claims regarding her time as Deputy Chief of Police. The Court denies the Village's motion to dismiss Sailsbery's Title VII claims in Counts I, II, III, and IV, but the Court dismisses Sailsbery's claims against Mayor Ha nks and Fairman in Counts V and VI to the extent they allege violations of Title VII. Finally, the Court denies the Village's motion to dismiss Sailsbery's Monell claim in Count VIII. Defendants are ordered to answer the remaining allegations in the complaint by September 29, 2016. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/8/2016:Mailed notice(rj, )
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court denies Sailsbery's motion to disqualify 9 . McGrath is directed to file an affidavit by April 29, 2016 that he has fully disclosed to the Village and Fairman the risks and advantages of concurrent representation and that the Village and Fairman have provided written informed consent to McGrath and the Firm serving as Fairman's counsel in this lawsuit. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 4/11/2016: Mailed notice(rj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
