Vernon v. Kenco Logistics Services

Vernon v. Kenco Logistics Services

Plaintiff:	Henry Vernon
Defendant:	Kenco Logistics Services
Case Number:	1:2015cv10961
Filed:	December 7, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2018	Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court denies Henry's motion for voluntary dismissal of his case without prejudice 77 . The Court grants in part and denies in part Henry's motion to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal, to strike defendant Kenco's motion for summary judgment, to set aside former defendant Mars's dismissal, and for sanctions 90 . The Court grants Henry's request to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal, but denies the remainder of his req uested relief. Because the Court has denied Henry's request to strike Kenco's motion for summary judgment, Henry must now respond to that motion as he was previously ordered to do. Henry has had nearly a year to review Kenco's motion a nd develop his responsive arguments, and he missed his prior response deadline. The Court will allow Henry until March 29, 2018 to file a response to the motion for summary judgment, with Kenco's reply due on April 13, 2018. If Henry fails to file a response on or before March 29, 2018, this Court will dismiss his case with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/8/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2018

Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court denies Henry's motion for voluntary dismissal of his case without prejudice 77 . The Court grants in part and denies in part Henry's motion to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal, to strike defendant Kenco's motion for summary judgment, to set aside former defendant Mars's dismissal, and for sanctions 90 . The Court grants Henry's request to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal, but denies the remainder of his req uested relief. Because the Court has denied Henry's request to strike Kenco's motion for summary judgment, Henry must now respond to that motion as he was previously ordered to do. Henry has had nearly a year to review Kenco's motion a nd develop his responsive arguments, and he missed his prior response deadline. The Court will allow Henry until March 29, 2018 to file a response to the motion for summary judgment, with Kenco's reply due on April 13, 2018. If Henry fails to file a response on or before March 29, 2018, this Court will dismiss his case with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/8/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vernon v. Kenco Logistics Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Vernon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kenco Logistics Services
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?