Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc.

Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Fulton Dental, LLC
Defendant:	Bisco, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2015cv11038
Filed:	December 8, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Edmond E. Chang
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 2, 2016	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Defendant Bisco's motion to deposit funds with the Court 21 is granted, and the $3,600 must be deposited with the Clerk's Of fice, along with a notice of deposit (to be filed on the electronic docket), by 09/07/2016. After the funds are deposited, the Court will order the funds to be released to Fulton Dental in accordance with Rule 67(b). Upon the making of the deposit, F ulton Dental's individual and class claims will be moot, and the entire case will be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1). After the deposit is made, judgment shall also be entered for Fulton Dental in the amount of $3,005, along with an injunctio n against Bisco to refrain from using any device to send an unsolicited facsimile advertisement to Fulton Dental, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b). Fulton Dental is directed to file a Rule 54(d) bill of costs with the Court by 09/14/2016; the costs will be paid out of the remainder of the deposit. Status hearing of 09/13/2016 is vacated. Mailed notice. (pjg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 2, 2016

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Defendant Bisco's motion to deposit funds with the Court 21 is granted, and the $3,600 must be deposited with the Clerk's Of fice, along with a notice of deposit (to be filed on the electronic docket), by 09/07/2016. After the funds are deposited, the Court will order the funds to be released to Fulton Dental in accordance with Rule 67(b). Upon the making of the deposit, F ulton Dental's individual and class claims will be moot, and the entire case will be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1). After the deposit is made, judgment shall also be entered for Fulton Dental in the amount of $3,005, along with an injunctio n against Bisco to refrain from using any device to send an unsolicited facsimile advertisement to Fulton Dental, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b). Fulton Dental is directed to file a Rule 54(d) bill of costs with the Court by 09/14/2016; the costs will be paid out of the remainder of the deposit. Status hearing of 09/13/2016 is vacated. Mailed notice. (pjg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fulton Dental, LLC
Represented By:	Alexander Holmes Burke
Represented By:	Daniel J. Marovitch
Represented By:	Anthony Paronich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bisco, Inc.
Represented By:	Jeffrey J. Halldin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?