Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Heisler et al
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC |
Brian Heisler doing business as Your DJ Pros and Centennial Lanes, Inc. |
1:2015cv11191 |
December 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Milton I Shadur |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Milton I. Shadur:Status hearing set for 2/19/2016 is stricken. This case is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.Mailed notice (clw, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Milton I. Shadur:This is the initial scheduling order entered by this Court after the filing of the Complaint. Counsel for plaintiff is ordered to cause a copy of this order to be delivered forthwith to each defendant in the same manner that process has been or is being served on such defendant. There will be a status hearing--a "scheduling conference", as that term is used in attached Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 16(b), at 9:00 a.m. on February 19, 2016. Counsel for plaintiff and for each defendant that has been served with process or has appeared at least 28 days before that Status Hearing Date are ordered to meet not later than 14 days before the Status Hearing Date to comply with the provisions of Rules 26(f) and 26(a) (c) and this District Courts LR 26.1 Counsel for the parties are urged to undertake serious settlement efforts before the scheduled Status Hearing when no major investment in counsel's time (and clients' money) has yet taken place. If such efforts are unsuccessful, counsel should be prepared to attend the scheduled Status Hearing to discuss briefly their proposed discovery plan and other subjects appropriate for inclusion in the scheduling order as referred to in Rule 16(b). No written status report is to be filed. Although this Court will not set a close-of-discovery scheduling order until both sides have a good sense of the time needed for that purpose, the parties are urged to join in setting their own target dates in that respect at their initial Rule 26(f) conference and to review those target dates regularly during the discovery process. If any party is unrepresented by counsel, that party must comply with this order personally. Mailed notice (clw, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Correction regarding #3 . (ph, ) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC regarding Summons And Complaint served on CENTENNIAL LANES, INC. on 12/31/2015 (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC (Vogt, Keith) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Centennial Lanes, Inc., Brian Heisler (jp, ) |
Filing 4 MAILED to plaintiff's counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (tlm) |
Filing 3 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (tlm) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/22/2016) (ph, ). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Milton I. Shadur. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (mc, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-11392453. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vogt, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.