DT Boring, Inc. v. Chicago Public Building Commission, The et al
| DT Boring, Inc. |
| Chicago Public Building Commission, The, Harbour Contractors, Inc., Environmental Design International, Inc. and John Dimos |
| 1:2015cv11222 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
Memorandum Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 3/8/2017: Motions to dismiss 73 76 are denied. Defendant Harbour's motion to strike 78 is denied. A joint status report is due by 4/12/2017. Status hearing is set for 4/20/2017 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gds)
|
|
Filing
64
Memorandum opinion and order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettlemanon 6/28/2016: Plaintiff's motion 10 to disqualify Duane Morris is denied without prejudice. PBC's motion 35 to dismiss is denied. EDI's 37 and Harbour� 39;s 30 motions to dismiss are granted with respect to counts I and II and denied with respect to count III. An amended complaint is due by 7/25/2016. A joint status report is due by 8/8/2016. Status hearing is set for 8/18/2016 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 6/28/2016:Mailed notice(gds, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
