Elizabeth Berg v. CI Investments, Inc
| Elizabeth Berg |
| CI Investments, Inc, Nexus Risk Management, Inc., Nexus Risk Management LP and Charles Gilbert |
| 1:2015cv11534 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Jeffrey Cole |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM Opinion: CI's motion for partial summary judgment on Counts IV and V of Berg's Second Amended Complaint is granted. CI's motion to strike the affidavit of Hamilton and additional statements 46-48, which rely on the affidavit, is also granted. All other motions are denied. It is so ordered. Status hearing set for 5/2/2017 at 9:30 AM. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 4/7/2017. Mailed notice(vcf, )
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM Opinion: This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, CI Investments Inc. ("CI") for leave to file a crossclaim against Defendants and Third Party Defendants, Charles Gilbert (&qu ot;Gilbert"), Nexus Risk Management Inc., and Nexus Risk Management LP (collectively, "Nexus Defendants"). Dkt. 58. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. Status hearing set for 10/6/2016 at 9:30 AM. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/23/2016. Mailed notice(vcf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
