Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. D'Agnolo et al
Minnesota Life Insurance Company |
Clorinda D'Agnolo, Linda Sullivan, Susan M. Lipari, John O. Lipari, Mary A. Lipari, Carol A. Lipari and P.J.L. |
1:2015cv11643 |
December 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Manish S. Shah |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 CORRECTED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 1/25/2017: The Lipari's partial motion for summary judgment, 57 , is granted in part and denied in part. The David M. Lipari Trust is the sole beneficiary of the Minnesota Life Insurance policy. There are remaining disputes of material fact as to which is the controlling trust document and as to who is the trustee. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 118 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 1/18/2017: The Lipari's partial motion for summary judgment, 57 , is granted in part and denied in part. The David M. Lipari Trust is the sole beneficiary of the Minnesota Life Insurance policy. There are remaining disputes of material fact as to which is the controlling trust document and as to who is the trustee. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.