Ganguli v. Malaysia Airlines Berhad et al
Plaintiff: Sanjit Ganguli
Defendant: Malaysia Airlines Berhad and Malaysian Airlines System Berhad
Case Number: 1:2015cv11832
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Harry D Leinenweber
Nature of Suit: Airplane
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Airline Crash
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2016 ELECTRONIC Acknowledgment of the case transferred to the District of Columbia as case 1:16-cv-01047, filed 06/03/2016. (meg, )
June 3, 2016 Filing 19 TRANSFERRED to the the District of Columbia the electronic record. (tt, )
June 3, 2016 Filing 18 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to the District of Columbia. Mailed notice (tt, )
June 3, 2016 ***Civil Case Terminated. (tt, )
April 8, 2016 Filing 17 NOTICE of Correction regarding #15 (cc, )
March 16, 2016 Filing 16 EXHIBIT by Defendants Malaysia Airlines Berhad, Malaysian Airlines System Berhad to Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit F, #6 Exhibit G, #7 Exhibit H, #8 Exhibit I-M)(cc, )
March 16, 2016 Filing 15 BRIEF in Support of Motion for Transfer of Actions to the Northern District of Illinois Pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1407 for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings by Malaysia Airlines Berhad, Malaysian Airlines System Berhad (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Actions, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Cover Letter)(cc, ) (Main Document 15 replaced on 4/8/2016) (cc, ).
March 16, 2016 Filing 14 MOTION of Defendants Malaysian Airline System Berhard (Administrator Appointed)and Malaysia Airlines Berhad for Transfer of Actions to the Northern District of Illinois Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings (cc, )
March 7, 2016 Filing 13 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Malaysian Airlines System Berhad and Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 Statement (Walker, Richard)
March 7, 2016 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint , Separate Defenses, Rule 44.1 Notice, Objection to Jury Demand by Malaysian Airlines System Berhad(Walker, Richard)
March 7, 2016 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Malaysian Airlines System Berhad by Marnie Allison Holz (Holz, Marnie)
March 7, 2016 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Malaysian Airlines System Berhad by Robert Austin Braun, III (Braun, Robert)
March 7, 2016 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Malaysian Airlines System Berhad by Telly Andrews (Andrews, Telly)
March 7, 2016 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Malaysian Airlines System Berhad by Richard Alan Walker (Walker, Richard)
January 11, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sanjit Ganguli Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Durkin, Kevin)
January 11, 2016 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Sanjit Ganguli. Malaysian Airlines System Berhad waiver sent on 1/6/2016, answer due 3/7/2016. (Durkin, Kevin)
December 30, 2015 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanjit Ganguli as Independent Administrator of the Estates of MUKTESH MUKHERJEE and XIAOMO BAI, Deceased by Tracy A Brammeier (Brammeier, Tracy)
December 30, 2015 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanjit Ganguli as Independent Administrator of the Estates of MUKTESH MUKHERJEE and XIAOMO BAI, Deceased by Michael Sean Krzak (Krzak, Michael)
December 30, 2015 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanjit Ganguli as Independent Administrator of the Estates of MUKTESH MUKHERJEE and XIAOMO BAI, Deceased by Kevin P. Durkin (Durkin, Kevin)
December 30, 2015 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Durkin, Kevin)
December 30, 2015 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sanjit Ganguli as Independent Administrator of the Estates of MUKTESH MUKHERJEE and XIAOMO BAI, Deceased; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-11442822.(Durkin, Kevin)
December 30, 2015 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Malaysia Airlines Berhad (5 addresses), Malaysian Airlines System Berhad (5 addresses) (jp, )
December 30, 2015 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown. (daj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ganguli v. Malaysia Airlines Berhad et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sanjit Ganguli
Represented By: Kevin P. Durkin
Represented By: Michael Sean Krzak
Represented By: Tracy A Brammeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Malaysia Airlines Berhad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Malaysian Airlines System Berhad
Represented By: Richard Alan Walker
Represented By: Robert Braun
Represented By: Telly Andrews
Represented By: Marnie Allison Holz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?