Mueller v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
| Mueller and Elizabeth Mueller |
| Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd., Acrux DDS PTY Ltd., Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC |
| 1:2016cv00910 |
| January 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: All claims against Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd., Acrux DDS Pty Ltd., Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. MDL member case terminated. (pjg, ) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal / STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Solow, Andrew) |
Filing 11
ORDER: Motion to substitute counsel 1475 (filed in lead case 14 C 1748) is granted and the motion hearing date of 8/30/2016 is vacated. Attorney Turner W. Branch is substituted by Attorney Margaret Moses Branch on all cases on Exhibit A attached hereto. The Clerk is directed to enter this order in case no. 14 C 1748 and all cases included in Exhibit A. The Clerk is further directed to terminate Attorney Turner W. Branch and add Attorney Margaret Moses Branch as counsel for plaintiffs in case no. 14 C 1748 and all cases included in Exhibit A. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/26/2016.(gcy, )
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to amended complaint * Short Form Answer Of Defendants Eli Lilly And Company And Lilly USA, LLC; And Jury Demand * by Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC(Kwuon, Janet) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to amended complaint * Short Form Answer Of Defendants Acrux DDS Pty Ltd And Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd; And Jury Demand * by Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd., Acrux DDS PTY Ltd.(Kwuon, Janet) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd., Acrux DDS PTY Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC by Janet H. Kwuon (Kwuon, Janet) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd., Acrux DDS PTY Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC by David Edward Stanley (Stanley, David) |
| Filing 6 CORRECTED AMENDED complaint by Elizabeth Mueller against All Defendants (Branch, Turner) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED complaint by Elizabeth Mueller against All Defendants (Branch, Turner) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant GlaxoSmithKline, LLC by Andrew Keith Solow (Solow, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc by Andrew Keith Solow (Solow, Andrew) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 16-cv-00910 Mueller v. Eli Lilly and Company et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2545 ) (sj, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David Mueller, executor plaintiff Elizabeth Mueller by Turner W Branch (Branch, Turner) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Elizabeth Mueller, David Mueller; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-11518177. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Branch, Turner) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
