Andersen v. City of Chicago et al
Daniel Andersen |
The City of Chicago, James Bednarkiewicz, Richard Bedran, Craig Cegielski, Dan Fitzgerald, John Herman, James Higgins, Daniel McWeeny, Ted Melko, Paul Nielsen, John Olson, L. Pawlowski, N. Rajewski, Michael Riley, Richard Rochowicz and Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago |
1:2016cv01963 |
February 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Virginia M. Kendall |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 924 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/28/2021. Plaintiff's Motion to reinstate his Monell claim against Defendants 902 is denied, and Plaintiff's Monell claims are dismissed without prejudice. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 674 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/14/2020. Defendants combined motion both moving for reconsideration of the exclusion of Dr. Krane's testimony and arguing that he may testify as to the general topic of uncertainty 660 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion to reconsider the exclusion of Dr. Krane's testimony is denied. Consistent with this Opinion and the June 16, 2020 Order, Dr. Krane may testify in a limited capacity on the general topic of uncertainty in interpreting partial DNA profiles with an unknown number of contributors. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 656 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 6/16/2020. Andersen's Motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Krane 392 is granted. Andersen's Motion to exclude Dr. Krane's undisclosed opinions 449 is dismissed as moot. Defendants are granted leave to file a limited supplemental brief, consistent with this Opinion, within 14 days of the filing of this Opinion. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 651 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/14/2020. Defendants' Motion to exclude Brzeczek's testimony 389 is granted. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 649 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/13/2020. Andersen's motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Warren 392 is granted in part and denied in part. Andersen's motion to exclude Dr. Warren's undisclosed opinions 449 is also granted in part and denied in part. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 434 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/26/2019. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 327 is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants Summary Judgment for Defendants on Count III because An dersen has failed to establish a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether evidence was destroyed in bad faith. Summary judgment is otherwise denied. Defendants Rajewski and Pawlowski are dismissed as Defendants in this case. Trial will proceed against all other Defendants on the counts that remain. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 309 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 2/4/2019. Mailed notice(lxs, ) |
Filing 90 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/14/2016. City of Chicago's Motion to bifurcate and stay discovery on Andersen's Monell claim 74 is granted. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.