Citibank, NA v. Municipal Employees' Officers' and Officials' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago et al
| Citibank, NA |
| Municipal Employees' Officers' and Officials' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago, Frank M. Galvin and James P. Galvin |
| 1:2016cv02599 |
| February 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/26/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies defendant's motion to dismiss [dkt. no. 12]; directs plaintiff to a dd the Fund's board of trustees as a defendant via the filing of an amended complaint by no later than August 3, 2016; and directs defendants to answer the amended complaint by no later than August 24, 2016. The case set for a status hearing on August 12, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., at which the Court will set a discovery and pretrial schedule and will discuss with the parties the possibility of settlement. Counsel are directed to confer prior to that date to attempt to agree on a schedule to propose to the Court. Plaintiff's counsel should be prepared to address at that time the status of defendants Frank Galvin and James Galvin. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
