Puszyk v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Puszyk v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Michael Puszyk
Defendant:	Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2016cv02644
Filed:	February 26, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	XX Outside US
Presiding Judge:	Milton I. Shadur
Nature of Suit:	Airplane
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2016	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM Order: This Court's extremely brief June 27 memorandum order alerted both sides to the incorrectness of the allegation by Michael Puszyk ("Puszyk") that sought to place venue in this judicial district, thus anticipating t he scheduled June 29 presentment of the alternative motion by Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta") (1) to dismiss on forum non conveniens principles or (2) to transfer this action to the United States District for the Eastern District of New Y ork. Puszyk's counsel has just responded by acknowledging the venue problem and consenting to transfer this action as Delta has sought. To spare both counsel the need to come to court tomorrow: 1. this action is ordered to be transferred for thwith to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; and 2. Delta's alternative forum-non-conveniens motion is denied as moot (but no view is expressed by this Court as to the position that the transferee court may take if that same issue were to be presented to it). Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/28/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )
June 27, 2016	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM Order. Defendant Delta Airlines, Inc. ("Delta") has noticed up for presentment on June 29 its motion for alternative relief: (1) dismissal of the Complaint brought against it by Michael Puszyk ("Puszyk") under forum n on conveniens principles or (2) transfer of the situs of this action from this judicial district. This Court has reviewed Puszyk's Complaint in light of Delta's motion, and it is crystal clear that Complaint paragraph 5 as drafted by Pus zyk's counsel is simply untrue: Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This memorandum order is issued as a heads-up to Puszyk's counsel to be prepared for a ruling by this Court at the time of presentment. Because there is certainly no reason to keep this action here, Puszyk's counsel must be prepared to respond to both of Delta's alternative arguments. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/27/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2016

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM Order: This Court's extremely brief June 27 memorandum order alerted both sides to the incorrectness of the allegation by Michael Puszyk ("Puszyk") that sought to place venue in this judicial district, thus anticipating t he scheduled June 29 presentment of the alternative motion by Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta") (1) to dismiss on forum non conveniens principles or (2) to transfer this action to the United States District for the Eastern District of New Y ork. Puszyk's counsel has just responded by acknowledging the venue problem and consenting to transfer this action as Delta has sought. To spare both counsel the need to come to court tomorrow: 1. this action is ordered to be transferred for thwith to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; and 2. Delta's alternative forum-non-conveniens motion is denied as moot (but no view is expressed by this Court as to the position that the transferee court may take if that same issue were to be presented to it). Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/28/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )

June 27, 2016

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM Order. Defendant Delta Airlines, Inc. ("Delta") has noticed up for presentment on June 29 its motion for alternative relief: (1) dismissal of the Complaint brought against it by Michael Puszyk ("Puszyk") under forum n on conveniens principles or (2) transfer of the situs of this action from this judicial district. This Court has reviewed Puszyk's Complaint in light of Delta's motion, and it is crystal clear that Complaint paragraph 5 as drafted by Pus zyk's counsel is simply untrue: Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This memorandum order is issued as a heads-up to Puszyk's counsel to be prepared for a ruling by this Court at the time of presentment. Because there is certainly no reason to keep this action here, Puszyk's counsel must be prepared to respond to both of Delta's alternative arguments. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/27/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Puszyk v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Puszyk
Represented By:	Alexandra Marie Wisner
Represented By:	Floyd A. Wisner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?