Gonzalez v. City of Waukegan et al
Angel Gonzalez |
City of Waukegan, Adrene Yancey, Luis Marquez, Edward Dennis and John Moran |
1:2016cv02906 |
March 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Milton I. Shadur |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. This memorandum opinion and order is issued sua sponte because counsel representing all of the defendants involved have filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Gonzalez's First Amended Complaint -- a responsive pleading that contains some really troubling aspects that need correction. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 12/28/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion to dismiss 22 is denied in all respects save as to AC Count IV, as to which decision is deferred. Defendants are ordered to file an answer to all counts except Count IV on or before December 23 , 2016, and a status hearing is set for 9 a.m. December 30, 2016 unless any counsel will be unavailable at that time. In that event counsel should confer among themselves and advise this Court's courtroom deputy as to the earliest date of their joint availability, and this Court will reschedule the status hearing. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 12/6/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.