Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Margery Newman
Defendant:	Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2016cv03530
Filed:	March 23, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 3, 2018	Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/3/2018. Mailed notice (aee, )
March 9, 2017	Filing 50 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant's motion to dismiss 29 is granted and the case is dismissed without prejudice. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice, however, and Plaintiff may move to amend her complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. Any such motion should attach a proposed amended complaint and be supported by a brief of no more than five pages describing how the proposed amendments cure the def iciencies identified by the Court. Defendant should not respond to the motion to amend unless ordered to do so by the Court. If after 30 days no motion to amend is filed, the dismissal will be converted into a dismissal with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/9/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 3, 2018

Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/3/2018. Mailed notice (aee, )

March 9, 2017

Filing 50 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant's motion to dismiss 29 is granted and the case is dismissed without prejudice. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice, however, and Plaintiff may move to amend her complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. Any such motion should attach a proposed amended complaint and be supported by a brief of no more than five pages describing how the proposed amendments cure the def iciencies identified by the Court. Defendant should not respond to the motion to amend unless ordered to do so by the Court. If after 30 days no motion to amend is filed, the dismissal will be converted into a dismissal with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/9/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margery Newman
Represented By:	Thomas Cusack Cronin
Represented By:	Robert R Duncan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?