Kolton et al v. Frerichs
| Anthony D. Kolton and S David Goldberg |
| Michael W Frerichs |
| 1:2016cv03792 |
| March 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM Opinion: Plaintiffs' Motion to Class Certification 46 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 3/28/2018. Mailed notice(vcf, )
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM Opinion: This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant Michael W. Frerichs ("Frerichs"), in his official capacity as the Illinois State Treasurer (the "Treasurer"), to dismiss, Dkt. 15 , the Cla ss Action Complaint (the "Complaint"), Dkt. 1, of Plaintiffs Anthony D. Kolton ("Kolton") and S. David Goldberg ("Goldberg"), individually, and on behalf of classes of all others similarly situated (collectively, &qu ot;Plaintiffs") pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Dkt. 15 , at p. 1. For the reasons set forth below, Frerichs's motion is granted under Rule 12(b)(1). The Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction; consequently, it does not reach the merits of the case, nor does it rule on Frerichs's motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/16/2016. Mailed notice(vcf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
