Badillo et al v. City Of Chicago
Plaintiff: Badillo, Natalie Badillo and Marina Pulido
Defendant: City Of Chicago and Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv04707
Filed: April 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: John W Darrah
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2016 Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John W. Darrah: A NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal having been filed, this case is hereby closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(maf)
September 30, 2016 Filing 33 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Natalie Badillo, Marina Pulido (Carroll, Katrina)
September 27, 2016 Filing 32 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John W. Darrah: Defendant Xerox State & Local Solutions, Inc.'s Second Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time #30 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead by 10/24/16. Status hearing set for 10/18/16 is reset to 11/17/16 at 9:30 a.m. No appearances necessary on 10/6/16 or 10/18/16. All other dates remain as scheduled.Mailed notice(maf)
September 26, 2016 Filing 31 NOTICE of Motion by Stanley Clarence Ball for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #30 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 10/6/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ball, Stanley)
September 26, 2016 Filing 30 MOTION by Defendant Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) (Ball, Stanley)
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER: Defendant Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #27 is granted. Defendant Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. shall file a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint by 10/3/16. No appearances necessary on 9/27/16. All other dates remain as scheduled. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/14/2016. Mailed notice. (kp, )
September 13, 2016 Filing 28 NOTICE of Motion by Stanley Clarence Ball for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #27 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/27/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ball, Stanley)
September 13, 2016 Filing 27 MOTION by Defendant Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) (Ball, Stanley)
September 13, 2016 Filing 26 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. by Stanley Clarence Ball (Ball, Stanley)
September 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER: Defendant City of Chicago's Unopposed Motion to Stay the Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint #23 is granted. Defendant City of Chicago's Motion to Dismiss #15 is withdrawn and the briefing schedule is vacated. Defendant City of Chicago shall file a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint by 10/3/16. Status hearing set for 9/14/16 is reset to 10/18/16 at 9:30 a.m. No appearances necessary on 9/14/16. All other dates remain as scheduled. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/6/2016. Mailed notice. (kp, )
September 2, 2016 Filing 24 UNOPPOSED NOTICE of Motion by Grant Erwin Ullrich for presentment of motion to stay #23 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/14/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ullrich, Grant)
September 2, 2016 Filing 23 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago to stay the time for it to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint - UNOPPOSED (Ullrich, Grant)
September 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER: Status hearing set for 9/14/2016 at 09:30 AM. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/2/2016. Mailed notice (mmy, )
August 23, 2016 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. (pg, )
August 19, 2016 Filing 21 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Natalie Badillo, Marina Pulido against City of Chicago, Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Carroll, Katrina)
August 10, 2016 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John W. Darrah: Status hearing set for 8/16/16 is re-set to 11/2/16 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice(maf)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #15 is entered and briefed as follows: response by 8/26/16, reply by 9/9/16. Status hearing/ruling set for 11/2/16 at 9:30 a.m. No appearances necessary on 8/11/16 or 8/16/16. All other dates remain as scheduled. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 8/2/2016. Mailed notice (jjr, )
August 1, 2016 Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Andrew W Worseck (Worseck, Andrew)
July 29, 2016 Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Grant Erwin Ullrich for presentment of motion to dismiss #15 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 8/11/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ullrich, Grant)
July 29, 2016 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by City of Chicago in support of motion to dismiss #15 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Ullrich, Grant)
July 29, 2016 Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago to dismiss (Ullrich, Grant)
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #12 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead by 7/29/16. No appearances necessary on 8/2/16. All other dates remain as scheduled. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 7/20/2016. Mailed notice. (kp, )
July 19, 2016 Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Grant Erwin Ullrich for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #12 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 8/2/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ullrich, Grant)
July 19, 2016 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Ullrich, Grant)
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #9 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead by 7/22/16. No appearances necessary on 7/5/16. All other dates remain as scheduled. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 6/30/2016. Mailed notice. (kp, )
June 29, 2016 Filing 10 UNOPPOSED NOTICE of Motion by Grant Erwin Ullrich for presentment of extension of time #9 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 7/5/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ullrich, Grant)
June 29, 2016 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time - UNOPPOSED (Ullrich, Grant)
May 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #6 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond by 7/1/16. No appearances necessary on 6/2/16. Initial status hearing set for 6/28/16 is re-set to 8/16/16 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 5/27/2016. Mailed notice. (kp, )
May 27, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by Grant Erwin Ullrich for presentment of extension of time #6 before Honorable John W. Darrah on 6/2/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Ullrich, Grant)
May 27, 2016 Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead - UNOPPOSED (Ullrich, Grant)
May 27, 2016 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Grant Erwin Ullrich (Ullrich, Grant)
May 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Initial status hearing set for June 28, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 5/6/2016. Mailed notice (mmy, )
May 4, 2016 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City of Chicago (mgh, )
April 27, 2016 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs NATALIE BADILLO, MARINA PULIDO by Kyle Alan Shamberg (Shamberg, Kyle)
April 27, 2016 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs NATALIE BADILLO, MARINA PULIDO by Katrina Carroll (Carroll, Katrina)
April 27, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by NATALIE BADILLO, MARINA PULIDO; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-11872940. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carroll, Katrina)
April 27, 2016 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John W. Darrah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. (ew, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Badillo et al v. City Of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of Chicago
Represented By: Andrew W Worseck
Represented By: Grant Erwin Ullrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xerox State and Local Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Stanley Clarence Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Badillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Badillo
Represented By: Katrina Carroll
Represented By: Kyle Alan Shamberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marina Pulido
Represented By: Katrina Carroll
Represented By: Kyle Alan Shamberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?