Brandes v. Uchiek et al
| Rich A. Brandes |
| Ted Uchiek, William Kinville, Officer Quick, Officer Spect, Mizzuno and Armor Corr. Health Services, Inc |
| 1:2016cv05285 |
| May 16, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| Jorge L. Alonso |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court grants defendants' motion 96 for summary judgment. Defendants are granted summary judgment on Counts I and II. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 5/19/2020. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER. Defendants Mark Curran, Ted Uchiek, William Kinville and the County of Lake's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint 42 and Defendants Mizuno and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 44 are granted. Plaintiff is given one last chance to amend his complaint by February 14, 2018 to state a claim or this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Status hearing previously set for January 23, 2018 is stricken and reset to March 15, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. [For further details see order.] Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/16/2018. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
