Johnson v. Butler
Petitioner: Llewillyn Johnson
Respondent: Kimberly Butler
Case Number: 1:2016cv05373
Filed: May 18, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Samuel Der-Yeghiayan
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Clerk is directed to substitute Christine Brannon as the respondent in this case. For the reasons stated above, the Court denies Johnson's petition for habeas corpus and declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the petition for habeas corpus. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/13/2021. Mailed notice. (mma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Llewillyn Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kimberly Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?