The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: The Chamberlain Group, Inc.
Defendant: Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., OWT Industries, Inc., Et Technology (Wuxi) Co. Ltd. and Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Counter_claimant: One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc. and OWT Industries, Inc.
Counter_defendant: The Chamberlain Group, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv06097
Filed: June 10, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 740 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Court's opinion: (1) TTI's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is denied (Dkt. 573); (2) TTI's Motion for a New Trial is denied (Dkt. 619); (3) Chamberlain's Motio n for a Permanent Injunction is granted (Dkt. 622); (4) Chamberlain's Motion for Enhanced Damages is granted (Dkt. 624, 625), and the Court accordingly awards Chamberlain $11.4 million in treble damages; (5) Chamberlain's Motion for Pr ejudgment Interest and Supplemental Damages is granted in part (Dkt. 630), and the Court awards the following: (a) prejudgment interest of $42,347, calculated by using the 52-week treasury bill rate, compounded monthly; (b) for the '275 pat ent, $900,793 in GDO lost profits; $54,672 in royalties; and $134,496 in accessory lost profits, unless TTI has some repurchased GDO stock still on hand, in which case TTI may move the Court within fourteen (14) days to reduce the acce ssory lost profits damages accordingly and; (c) for the '966 patent, $18,224 in royalties; (6) Chamberlain's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is granted in part (Dkt. 703, 704), though the Court will not order any fees until the parties submit, within fourteen (14) days, a joint report as described in the opinion; (7) Chamberlains Bill of Costs is granted in part (Dkt. 634), though the Court will not order any costs until Chamberlain submits, within fourteen (14) days, a revised bi ll of costs in accordance with the opinion. Status hearing set for 6/19/18 at 9:00 a.m., at which time Defendants will explain whether they still require a ruling on their motion to seal (ECF No. 699). Chamberlain shall respond to Defendants' motion for an ongoing royalty (ECF No. 727) by 6/7/18. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/23/2018: Mailed notice (maf)
September 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 617 MOTION by Defendants OWT Industries, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. for judgment as a Matter of Law (White, Jason)
August 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 581 MOTION by Defendants OWT Industries, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. for judgment as a matter of law as to invalidity (White, Jason)
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 573 MOTION by Defendants OWT Industries, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. for judgment as a matter of law (White, Jason)
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 549 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/14/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
August 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 517 Memorandum Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/8/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
April 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 339 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER on claim construction Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/7/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
March 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 322 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/22/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
January 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 263 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/23/2017:Mailed notice(wp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Chamberlain Group, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin C. Elacqua
Represented By: Nicole L. Little
Represented By: Matthew R. Mccullough
Represented By: Michael R. Rueckheim
Represented By: Maria Elena Stiteler
Represented By: Katherine Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Techtronic Industries North America, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One World Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OWT Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Et Technology (Wuxi) Co. Ltd.
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: One World Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Techtronic Industries North America, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: OWT Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Abernathy
Represented By: Sanjay K. Murthy
Represented By: Nicholas A. Restauri
Represented By: Jason C. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: The Chamberlain Group, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin C. Elacqua
Represented By: Nicole L. Little
Represented By: Matthew R. Mccullough
Represented By: Michael R. Rueckheim
Represented By: Maria Elena Stiteler
Represented By: Katherine Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?