Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
| James Caruth |
| Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Wexford Medical, Michael Lemke, Michael Magana, Tarry Williams, Nikki Robinson, Randy Pfister, S. Miles, Tracy Engelson, Darrin Hunter, Khadeer Ahmad, Ester Martin and Doe |
| 1:2016cv06621 |
| June 23, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Edmond E. Chang |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
349
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court ruled as follows on Defendants' summary judgment motions: Wexford's motion 251 is granted; Dr. Sangster's motion 255 is granted; Dr. Sood's motion 259 is granted; Dr. Tilden's mo tion 263 is denied in large part; Dr. Trost's motion 267 is denied; PA Schwarz's motion 271 is granted; and PA Ojelade's motion 275 is denied. Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Dr. Sangster, Dr. Sood, Schwarz and Wexford. In person status hearing is set for October 24, 2023 at 10:00 AM to set a trial date. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 9/20/2023. (See attached Order for further detail.) Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the motion to dismiss the pre-October-2013 claims against Defendants Tilden and Ojelade is granted, but the motions to dismiss [110, 123] are otherwise denied. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.