United States of America v. Dodd
| United States of America |
| James Dodd |
| 1:2016cv06651 |
| June 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Milton I. Shadur |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, the pending cases on this Court's calendar are to be reassigned by the customary computerized random assignment system. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/8/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM Order: The Court orders attorney Theis to file a reply to the Government's Response on or before 6/19/17. See Memorandum Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 5/15/2017. Mailed notice(ep, )
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM Order: This Court's one page March 23 memorandum order concluded by "request[ing] a swift response from the United States Attorney's Office suggesting as early a date as may be feasible for the filing of its response in this action" brought by federal prisoner James Dodd ("Dodd") under the auspices of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On the very next day Assistant United States Attorney Paul Tzur filed the requested response, that (1) reflected the government' ;s view that the Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544, 2017 WL 855781(U.S. Mar. 6, 2017) controls here but (2) asked that the government's substantive response be scheduled for an April 21 fil ing because of counsel's previously planned week-long vacation and the press of other matters.This Court grants that request by attorney Tzur. As the March 23 order had contemplated, a status hearing is then set for 9 a.m. April 28, 2017 to discuss the need or lack of need for any further filings. Attorney Tzur is ordered to make arrangements for Dodd to participate telephonically in that status hearing. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/28/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, this Court requests a swift response from the United States Attorney's Office suggesting as early a date as may be feasible for the filing of its response in this action. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 3/23/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Dodd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James Dodd | |
| Represented By: | William H. Theis |
| Represented By: | William Todd Watson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
