Sanchez v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago et al
| Lynn Sanchez |
| Catholic Bishop of Chicago and Archdiocese of Chicago |
| 1:2016cv06983 |
| July 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Rebecca R. Pallmeyer |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER : Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 11/27/2018. Mailed notice. (etv, )
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order : Defendants' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative for Remittitur [84, 102] is granted in part and denied in part. There was a sufficient evidentiary basis to support the jury' ;s conclusion that Defendants retaliated against Plaintiff because of her protected conduct, so the court denies Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law. But the court grants Defendants' alternative motion and remits Plaintiff&# 039;s punitive damages. Plaintiff is directed to advise the court within 14 days whether she will accept an award of punitive damages in the amount of $50,000 or will request a new trial. Plaintiff's motion in limine 75 is stricken as moot. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 9/26/2018. Mailed notice. (etv, )
|
|
Filing
84
MOTION by Defendants Archdiocese of Chicago, Catholic Bishop of Chicago for judgment as a matter of law (Pall, Elizabeth)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
