Spraggins v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Alisa A. Spraggins
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2016cv07304
Filed: July 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Will
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Norgle
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier on 2/1/2018. Mailed notice. (jj, )
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier on 9/20/2017. Mailed notice. (jj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spraggins v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisa A. Spraggins
Represented By: Barry Alan Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: AUSA-SSA(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?