Lee v. Nasatir et al
| Elaine J. Lee |
| Scott Nasatir, David Brusak, Caroline Pate-Hefry and David Negron |
| 1:2016cv07528 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Milton I. Shadur |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM Order. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/10/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM Order: Elaine Lee ("Lee") has filed a self-prepared Complaint charging four defendants with employment discrimination under Title VII in connection with her employment as a school psychologist for the Melrose Park School Distric t 89 in Melrose Park, Illinois. Although this Court is contemporaneously issuing its customary initial scheduling order in the case, its printout of Lee's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) includes only its Ex. 1 (her EEOC Charge of Discrimination, show n as "page 8 of 8") but not EEOC's right-to-sue letter, which Complaint 8 mistakenly alleges "is attached as Exhibit 2." Accordingly Lee is ordered (1) to file the missing Ex. 2 (with a direction to the Clerk's Offic e that identifies it as part of this Case No. 16 C 7528) and also (2) to send a copy of that Exhibit directly to this Court's chambers, as required by District Court LR 5.2(f). Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/28/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
