Kurtis M. Bailey v. Bernzomatic et al
| Kurtis M. Bailey |
| Bernzomatic, Worthington Cylinder Corporation, Worthington Industries Inc., Irwin Industrial Tool Company, Newell Operating Company, Inc. and Does |
| 1:2016cv07548 |
| July 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Iain D. Johnston |
| Philip G. Reinhard |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
626
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 8/3/2021: For the reasons stated below, plaintiff's motion 613 to disqualify Judge Johnston is denied. Plaintiff's motion 605 to reconsider the revocation of the pro hac vice admission of Attorney Andrew Shalaby is denied. Plaintiff's motion 617 618 to exclude defendant's experts is denied. Plaintiff's objection 589 to Magistrate Judge Jensen's order 588 and plaintiff's objection [5 99] to Magistrate Judge Jensen's order 596 are overruled. Plaintiff's objection 608 610 to Magistrate Judge Jensen's report and recommendation 602 is overruled, the report and recommendation 602 is accepted and defendant&# 039;s motion 579 to preclude plaintiff from introducing testimony and documents from plaintiff's disclosed expert witnesses Anthony Roston and Manuel Marieiro is granted. This case is returned to Magistrate Judge Jensen for the management of further pretrial matters. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 8/3/2021:Notice mailed by judicial staff (pg, )
|
|
Filing
505
ORDER : Based on the reasons below, Attorney Shalaby is barred from filing any document in this case unless and until a sanctions motion is filed against him after the adjudication of plaintiff's claims on the merits and the court enters an order granting him leave to file. [See STATEMENT] Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 11/20/2019. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
|
Filing
402
ORDER-WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 2/1/2019: For the reasons stated below, defendants' motion 368 to file a supplemental exhibit is denied. Attorney Shalaby's motion 365 to file a surreply is granted a nd the surreply [365-1] is deemed filed. Attorney Shalaby's motion 387 requesting confirmation that the requirement for local counsel for plaintiff to sign all filings made on behalf of plaintiff does not apply to documents filed concerning At torney Shalaby's PHV admission is granted. Attorney Shalaby's motion 401 for leave to file supplemental documents and a related request to take judicial notice is denied. Attorney Shalaby's pro hac vice admission in this case is revo ked. Defendants' objection 343 to Magistrate Judge Johnston's order 333 is denied as moot. The court requests Magistrate Judge Johnston schedule a status conference with attorneys Chen and Nelson and defense counsel as soon as possible. [see STATEMENT-OPINION] Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 2/1/2019. Electronic notice (kms)
|
|
Filing
382
ORDER-WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/4/2018: On or before September 25, 2018, Attorney Shalaby is ordered to show cause, in writing, why he should not have his pro hac vice admission revoked or be otherwise sanction ed for the matters discussed below arising after Magistrate Judge Johnston's entry of the order 333 on defendant's motion to revoke Attorney Shalaby's pro have vice admission and the filing of the objections thereto. Specifically, At torney Shalaby must address: 1) His repeated misstatements of the content of Judge Efremsky's order entered May 8, 2018.2) His repeated false statements that Magistrate Judge Johnston was employed by Holland & Knight at the time Holland & Knight attorneys were representing the defendants in Attorney Shalaby's personal litigation against them and that Magistrate Judge Johnston refused to disqualify himself in the current case though such disqualification was mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(2) due to that employment. 3) His statement in his general bar application that he believed the State Bar of California only made an inquiry rather than conducted an investigation of him when previously in this case he referred to th e state bar matter as an investigation and his request for judicial notice to the 9th Circuit and the documents attached thereto indicate the matter was an investigation. Unless later ordered by the court, no response by defendants is requested.The court defers ruling on the ultimate questions raised by defendants' objection 343 until after receiving Attorney Shalaby's response to this order to show cause. [see STATEMENT-OPINION] Electronic notice (kms)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER-WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 1/11/2017: For the reasons stated below, defendants' motion 63 to strike and dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Counts I and IV are dismissed. Count III is stricken. The motion to dismiss is denied as to Count II. The prayer for attorneys' fees is stricken. Otherwise, the motion to strike is denied. [see STATEMENT-OPINION] Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 1/11/2017. Mailed notice (kms)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER-WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/21/2016: For the reasons set forth below, the judgment 53 is vacated. The order 52 dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is vacated in part. Worthing ton Cylinder Corporation and Worthington Industries, Inc. are reinstated as defendants. Bernzomatic is terminated on the docket of this case as it does not appear to be an entity and thus was never an actual defendant. The dismissal order remains eff ective as to all other defendants. On or before October 7, 2016, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint against only Worthington Cylinder Corporation and Worthington Industries, Inc. If plaintiff wishes to add any additional defendants, such as Worthington Cylinders Wisconsin, LLC, he must file a motion, on or before October 28, 2016, seeking leave to so amend the complaint. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/21/2016. [see Statement-Opinion] Mailed notice (kms)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER/WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/6/2016: For the reasons stated below, this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [see STATEMENT-OPINION] Mailed notice (kms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
