Barrows v. Larry et al
| Henry Barrows |
| C Larry, Major Sawyer, LT. Givens, Sgt. Mays, Jerret, Lorna Anders, EGBE and John Doe |
| 1:2016cv07882 |
| August 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Livingston |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/12/2020. Defendant Sgt. Sawyer's Motion for Summary Judgment 119 is denied. Genuine disputes of material fact remain as to whether Sgt. Sawyer was deliberately indif ferent to Barrows' serious medical needs and whether he took this into account when he moved Barrows into a potentially unsafe cell. Sgt. Sawyer has also not shown he is entitled to qualified immunity. Defendants Dr. Larry, Wexford Health Source s, Inc, Baldwin, Lt. Givens, Sgt. Mayes and Egbe's Motions for Summary Judgement 116 and 119 are granted. Barrows has failed to show they were deliberately indifferent to his risk of suicide. The case against Sgt. Sawyer may proceed to trial. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/21/2018. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 75 is denied and the case shall move forward with Discovery. Status hearing set for 2/27/2018 at 9:00 AM stands. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
