Bhattacharya et al v. Capgemini North America, Inc et al
| Pranav Bhattacharya and Navaneetha Koothapillai |
| Capgemini North Ameica, Inc and Capgemini Financial Services USA, Inc |
| 1:2016cv07950 |
| August 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/14/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies plaintiffs' motion for class certification without prejudice in par t (with respect to count 1) and grants it in part (with respect to counts 2 through 4) [dkt. no. 49]. The Court certifies, pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3), the two subclasses described in the Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs Bhattacharya and Kooth apillai are appointed as class representatives, and their current counsel are appointed as class counsel. The Court defers ruling on the parties' pending cross-motions for summary judgment to allow time for class members to receive notice of the action and to avoid running afoul of the rule against one-way intervention. See Costello v. BeavEx, Inc., 810 F.3d 1045, 1057-58 (7th Cir. 2016). The case is set for an in-person status hearing on March 28, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. The Court expects the parties, before that date, to discuss and attempt to agree upon a proposed class notice or notices and to work on compiling a list of appropriate notice recipients. (mk)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/4/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying order, the Court denies defendants' motion to dismiss but rules that plaintiffs are not entitled to statutory penalties on count 1 of their complaint in its current form. The case remains set for a status hearing on December 5, 2016 as previously ordered. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
