Phillips v. Baxter et al
Garfield Phillips |
Phyllis Baxter, Gayle Stricklin, Rose Norris, William Willis and Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS) |
1:2016cv08233 |
August 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Will |
Charles P. Kocoras |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 166 MEMORANDUM Opinion: The Court grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 142 . Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all counts. Civil case terminated. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 3/28/2023. Mailed notice(vcf, ) |
Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion: The Court partially grants the Defendants' motion to dismiss. Counts I and II are dismissed to the extent they rely on allegations from 2012. Additionally, Phillips's allegations of sex discrimination in violation of Section 1981 are dismissed from Counts I and II. Phillips's claims of race discrimination under Sections 1981 and 1983, and sex discrimination under Section 1983 in Counts I and II are not dismissed. Counts III, IV, and V are dismissed in their entirety. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 5/6/2020. Mailed notice(vcf, ) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM Opinion: The Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss 22 . Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 5/24/2017. Mailed notice(vcf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.