TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. v. SS/T Auto LLC et al
| TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. |
| SS/T Auto LLC, Timothy Mark Owens and Carrie Ethel Owens |
| 1:2016cv08315 |
| August 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Milton I. Shadur |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Owenses' Amended Answer is stricken. They are granted leave to file a Second Amended Answer on or before November 17, 2016, so that the presently scheduled October 28 status hearing is vacated and replaced by a status hearing at 8:45 a.m. November 21, 2016. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 10/20/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM Order: This memorandum order is issued sua sponte because of a host of problematic aspects of the responsive pleading filed by defendants Timothy and Carrie Owens (collectively "Owenses"). The Owenses' Answer is stricken in its entirety, with leave granted to file a proper Amended Answer on or before October 14, 2016. This Court orders Owenses to show cause by the same October 14 date, pursuant to Rule 11(c)(3), as to why their conduct in connection with their initial filing has not violated Rule 11(b). Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/20/2016:Mailed notice(clw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
