Oil-Dri Corporation of America v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company
Plaintiff: Oil-Dri Corporation of America
Defendant: Nestle Purina Petcare Company
Case Number: 1:2016cv09179
Filed: September 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Virginia M. Kendall
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/9/2017. The Court construes Nestle's motions as motions to compel. The Court grants Nestle's Motions to Strike for Oil-Dri's Assertion of Alleged Induced Inf ringement 55 , Attempt to Claim an Earlier Priority Date 60 , 70 , and Initial and First Revised Infringement Contentions 80 , and Oil-Dri has 21 days from the entry of this Order to amend and disclose their Revised Initial Contentions consistent with Order. The Court denies Nestle's Motions to Strike for Oil-Dri's Addition of Alleged Use of Purported Invention 58 . Mailed notice(lk, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oil-Dri Corporation of America v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oil-Dri Corporation of America
Represented By: Dana Drexler Alvarado
Represented By: Shawn Michael Collins
Represented By: Robert L Dawidiuk
Represented By: Paul Robert Hale
Represented By: Michael P. Mazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nestle Purina Petcare Company
Represented By: Khara Coleman
Represented By: Emma C Harty
Represented By: Walter Jones, Jr.
Represented By: Robert G Lancaster
Represented By: David A. Roodman
Represented By: Nick E. Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?