Midamines Sprl Ltd. (Ill. Corp.) et al v. KBC Bank N.V.
| Midamines Sprl Ltd. (Ill. Corp.) and Midamines Sprl (Congo) |
| KBC Bank N.V. |
| 1:2016cv09429 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John J. Tharp |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
AMENDED Memorandum Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 1/16/2018. Mailed notice(air, )
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 12/15/2017: For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the defendant's motion to dismiss 35 is granted. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice und er Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and the case will be administratively terminated on the Court's docket. The Court further orders plaintiff Midamines SPRL Ltd. and its counsel, Hassan Abbas, to show c ause why they should not be sanctioned under Rule 11 for filing a complaint that is barred under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Midamines and Abbas are directed to file a brief that addresses the issues outlined in the opinion no later than January 12, 2018. A hearing date, if required, will be set following the Court's review of this submission. Mailed notice(air, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
