Polletta v. Dart et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Polletta
Defendant: Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Case Number: 1:2016cv09492
Filed: October 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Milton I. Shadur
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, defendant Cook County Sheriff's motion to quash the notice of deposition 60 is granted, without prejudice to Polletta's possible future reassertion of a "real need" for any of those depositions in more convincing terms. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/26/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, plaintiff's motion to compel 41 is granted, with Sheriff Dart being ordered to comply with that motion at the earliest feasible date. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/25/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM Order: On July 10, 2017 counsel for defendant Sheriff of Cook County filed "Defendant Cook County Sheriff's Motion To Quash the Notice of Deposition To Daniel Korso and for a Protective Order Limiting Scope of Said Deposition&quo t; (the "Motion," Dkt. No. 60). Although counsel for plaintiff Nicholas Polletta ("Polletta") is granted leave to file a response to the Motion on or before July 31, 2017, this Court finds the arguments presented by counsel for th e Sheriff more than ample to call for the deferral of the depositions referred to in the Motion, and it so orders pending a decision on the merits.To shift to another subject, this Court -- because of its having undergone major surgery on June 8 and a consequent need for rehabilitation -- has been unable since then to address defendants' responses to Polletta's motion for class certification. It orders Polletta to file a reply to those responses on or before July 31, 2017 so that this Court can deal with that motion on a fully-briefed basis. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/18/2017:Mailed notice(clw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Polletta v. Dart et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Polletta
Represented By: Patrick William Morrissey
Represented By: Thomas Gerard Morrissey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Dart
Represented By: James Emory Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cook County, Illinois
Represented By: James Emory Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?