Maui Jim, Inc. v. SmartBuy Guru Enterprises et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 14, 2018
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order and discussed during the February 8 hearing, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants [ECF No. 76] to produce documents responsive to Plainti ff's first requests for production nos. 12 and 14-22 is granted. The documents should be produced forthwith. Against a background of continuing disagreements about whether one party or the other is producing documents timely, if the parties cannot agree when these documents will be produced, then Plaintiff can bring that issue to the Court. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 2/14/2018. Mailed notice(ber, )
|January 23, 2018
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 1/23/2018: Maui Jim's motion to dismiss counterclaim 42 is granted in part and denied in part. Maui Jim's motion is denied with respect to Count VIII. Maui Jim 39;s motion to dismissis granted as to SmartBuyGlasses' remaining counterclaims. Accordingly, Counts I, II, III are dismissed, without prejudice. In addition, Counts IV, V, and VI are stricken, without prejudice. Count VII is dismissed, with prejudice for failure to state a claim.Mailed notice(mad, )
|November 27, 2017
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/27/2017. Mailed notice(lxs, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?