Harper v. Matthews et al
| Brian Harper |
| Reginald Matthews, Brian Wainscott and Ben Fapso |
| 1:2016cv11208 |
| December 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/26/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court dismisses Count 1 of Harper's second amended complaint but otherwise denies defendants' motions to dismiss [dkt. nos. 61 & 64]. At tomorrow morning's status hearing, the parties should be prepared to set a discovery schedule. (mk)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/23/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying order, the Court grants defendants' motions to dismiss [dkt. nos. 33, 34, 36]. U nless plaintiff files, by September 14, 2017, a motion for leave to amend including an amended complaint that states a viable claim over which the Court has jurisdiction, the Court will enter judgment against him. The case is set for a status hearing on September 18, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. The status hearing and ruling set for August 24, 2017 is vacated. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
