Dismukes v. Mueller et al
Petitioner: Jarrel Dismukes
Respondent: Robert C Mueller
Case Number: 1:2016cv11720
Filed: December 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Samuel Der-Yeghiayan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION. This matter is before the court on Petitioner Jarrel Dismukes' (Dismukes) pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus (Petition) brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Section 2254). For the reasons stated below, the Petition is denied. Signed by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 11/16/2017. Mailed notice (ags, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dismukes v. Mueller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jarrel Dismukes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert C Mueller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?