Miller v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Douglas A. Miller
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2017cv00235
Filed: January 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Sara L. Ellis
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion and Order, the Court affirms the ALJ's decision to deny Miller's application and grants the Commissioners motion for summary judgment 46 . Mail ILND 450. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/7/2019. Mailed notice(rj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas A. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Erin Elaine Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?