Lawton v. Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Lawton v. Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLC

Lawton v. Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLC

Plaintiff:	James S Lawton
Defendant:	Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLC
Case Number:	1:2017cv00297
Filed:	January 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Jorge L. Alonso
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 451
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 10, 2021	Filing 154 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant Swedish Covenant Hospital's motion for summary judgment 119 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to strike 152 is denied as moot. A status hearing is set for March 17, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall confer regarding the possibility of settlement and the scheduling of next steps, and they shall file a joint status report by March 12, 2021. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/10/2021. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
November 6, 2018	Filing 75 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Court grants in part and denies in part the Hospital's motion to dismiss 56 . The motion is granted as to plaintiff's breach of employment agreement claim, which is dismissed without prejudice for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. The motion is denied as to plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim. Status hearing remains set for November 14, 2018. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 11/6/2018. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 10, 2021

Filing 154 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendant Swedish Covenant Hospital's motion for summary judgment 119 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to strike 152 is denied as moot. A status hearing is set for March 17, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall confer regarding the possibility of settlement and the scheduling of next steps, and they shall file a joint status report by March 12, 2021. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/10/2021. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )

November 6, 2018

Filing 75 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Court grants in part and denies in part the Hospital's motion to dismiss 56 . The motion is granted as to plaintiff's breach of employment agreement claim, which is dismissed without prejudice for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. The motion is denied as to plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim. Status hearing remains set for November 14, 2018. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 11/6/2018. Notices mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawton v. Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James S Lawton
Represented By:	Christopher K Crimer
Represented By:	Nicholas Frank Esposito
Represented By:	Christopher Patrick Rubey
Represented By:	Bradley K. Staubus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?